Four
years ago I had a draft of King over the Water. It featured
the history of the Golden Dawn and the AO as it was then known,
mostly based on Sword of Wisdom, Magicians of the Golden Dawn
by Ellic Howe and the various Golden Dawn histories by RA Gilbert.
At the time I did not intend to go far into the history of either,
just to slide it into context with the AO Nisi documents which I
wanted to publish. In the end I put these into Mather's LastSecret so there was room to expand the history somewhat.
I
had shown the original King over the Water to RA Gilbert who
pointed out to me that there had been a lot more research done since
Howe and he started their work. So I set about finding the
information from later researcher's like Darcy Kuntz, Poke Runyon and
the wealth of new Primary texts which had popped up.
What
started to emerge was a different picture of the Golden Dawn which
had been previously thought. While some bits of information were
well known they had never been integrated into a coherent story.
Nor was there any attempt to define what the original Golden Dawn
members had meant when they used loaded terms like “Secret Chiefs”
to define their unseen administration. No one had, for example tried
to find out what this “politics” was that so distracted Samuel
Mathers that he was prepared to sacrifice his magic order for.
Did
history, for example provide us with the somewhat vexing possibility
that Golden Dawn lineage was impossible?
The
results were somewhat surprising, but what I had not expected was how
much deception would be revelled by groups claiming connections with
the original orders. It would appear that in an attempt to gain
credibility, they had based much of their history and “lineages”
on Howe's history or perhaps Sword
of Wisdom. This
would have been fine had it not been for the fact that Howe and
Ithell in particular did not have all the facts when they came to
write their history. Howe was keen to debunk the Golden Dawn and as
Runyen has pointed out seemed sit on information which he knew would
not back his facts. Recent researches by Christopher McIntosh
of Exeter University seem to limit many of Howe's theories.
So
if a group bases its lineage story on a history, touted by Howe, and
that information turns out to be wrong, it would appear to be proof
that such a group is not as authentic as it would claim. Surely if
such a group had the history and the material it claimed, they would
have access to the truth. Likewise a group which claimed to have
contact with the Secret Chiefs behind the Golden Dawn, say through a
German group, they should have material to back it up. Otherwise it
would just be yet another version of their original story. In fact
there are groups which have certain similarities with the Golden Dawn
(and SIRA) operating in Germany. But such groups are masonic and
lack the magical perspectives of the Golden Dawn. The only answer
for such a difference is that the Golden Dawn leadership,
particularly Samuel Mathers, gained information which was not from
these earth plane groups. Indeed we have descriptions from Samuel
and Mina saying that he contacted these secret chiefs through
seances. I just want to make it clear that the Z documents stand on
their own as one of the most important things within Western Magic.
Even if they were channeled communications from Crusty the Clown you
have to admit that they unlocked an entirely new sphere of Western
Magic. Equally that there was no way that an adept belonging to a
European Masonic Order would have that information. If they had,
then we would have found something similar elsewhere in magical
thought.
Likewise
there are some mythicans who spin stories about higher profile heads
of orders with Golden Dawn connections. One example, which did not
find its way into King over the Water was “Countess”
Tamara
Bourkoun
who was supposed to have a direct lineage from the Alpha et Omega via
Transhall Hayes to form her Order of the Sphinx and Pyramid and was
supposed to have given out AO charters. Actually this rumour was
common in the UK in the 1990s and I made somewhat half-hearted
attempt to find out more. Lately, with research for King I started
finding out old members of Bourkoun's order who presented me with
documentary evidence that Bourkoun got her Golden Dawn using Regardie
(and they had a long correspondence together) and her lineage,
according to one of her students was directly from her Enochian
contact. It was a fairly safe bet that she had never even heard of
the AO.
So
what does it matter really? Well yes. Part of the problem I have
with magical groups is the bullshit factor. How can you claim to
show people the Truth when you are actively campaigning to defend a
pack of lies? Why can you try to tell people that you have a big
secret to sell when you have spent more time promoting yourself as a
the upholder of Mathers' underpants?
The
mythologies that groups use to justify their existence are all quite
quaint until they are used to beat up other groups, or to relieve the
incredulous of cash. If history denies such groups their
antagonistic fantasy then it should be presented so students can make
up their own mind.
Ignorance
and faith have no part in magic and if someone tells you they know
the secrets to turning lead into gold but seems surprisingly lacking
in potable metals it is not enough to tell people “trust me.”
King
over the Water lays to rest that there can be any group who can claim
lineage from the original AO. It is a process which started to be
come unraveled with Mather's
Last Secret.
I have the impression that is something the AO mythcians have
already worked out as they currently trying to spin other alternative
histories and lineages. That is OK because they will be harder to
sell anyway.
However
I know that after the book comes out I will get a one star on Amazon
from Fr WA (we all know you are and we are not impressed by your maturity) who will then proceed to slag off those
who give positive reviews. I take comfort from the fact that One
star from Fr WA is worth five stars from the rest of the GD community.
